Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940

Humphrey's Executor v. United States - Significance, Separation Of Powers Requires That The President's Removal Power Be Limited, Further Readings

appellant court william chief

Appellant

Samuel F. Rathbun, as Executor of the Estate of William E. Humphrey, deceased

Appellee

United States

Appellant's Claim

That the president cannot remove an appointed commissioner without just cause.

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

William J. Donovan

Chief Lawyers for Appellee

Attorney General Homer S. Cummings, Solicitor General Stanley F. Reed

Justices for the Court

Louis D. Brandeis, Pierce Butler, Benjamin N. Cardozo, Charles Evans Hughes, James Clark McReynolds, Owen Josephus Roberts, Harlan Fiske Stone, George Sutherland (writing for the Court), Willis Van Devanter

Justices Dissenting

None

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

27 May 1935

Decision

The Court ruled that the president did not have the power to remove an appointed official without consent from Congress.

Related Cases

  • Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926).
  • A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935).
  • United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304 (1936).
  • Wiener v. United States, 357 U.S. 349 (1958).
John S. Williams and Clyde Manning Trials: 1921 - Peonage Outlawed, But Flourishes For 50 Years, Murdering The "evidence" Of Peonage, Southern Peonage Draws National Attention [next] [back] Home Building Loan Association v. Blaisdell - Significance, Supreme Court Finds That The Contract Clause Is Not Absolute, Size Of The Supreme Court

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or