Ex parte Grossman
Significance, Related Cases
Petitioner
Philip Grossman
Respondent
District of Illinois
Petitioner's Claim
That the president's pardon covers all offenses in the case of the petitioner, and the courts may not convict the petitioner of crimes that have been pardoned.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Louis J. Behan
Chief Lawyers for Respondent
Amos C. Miller, F. Bruce Johnstone
Justices for the Court
Louis D. Brandeis, Pierce Butler, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Joseph McKenna, James Clark McReynolds, Edward Terry Sanford, George Sutherland, William Howard Taft (writing for the Court), Willis Van Devanter
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
2 March 1925
Decision
The Supreme Court ruled that the president could pardon all offenses except in cases of impeachment.
Further Readings
- Berkman, Harvey. "Will the President Pardon His Friends." National Law Journal, Vol. 19, no. 10, November 4, 1996. Hurwitz, Howard L. An Encyclopedic Dictionary of American History New York: Washington Square Press, 1974.
- Robbins, James S. "Pardon Me, Mr. President." Washington Times, January 2, 1997.
Additional topics
- Henry Stevens Frances Hall and William Stevens Trial: 1926 - "i Have The Greatest Of All Blessings", A Mule-riding Pig Woman, "a Sort Of Genius"
- Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. - Public Welfare Versus Private Ownership, Court Rules For "a Changing World", Further Readings
- Ex parte Grossman - Significance
- Ex parte Grossman - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940