Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1637 to 1832

Marbury v. Madison - Significance, Marbury Goes To Court, Marshall Proclaims The Doctrine Of Judicial Review, Justice Alfred Moore

plaintiffs william washington deliver

Plaintiffs

William Marbury, William Harper, Robert R. Hooe, Dennis Ramsay

Defendant

James Madison, U.S. Secretary of State

Plaintiffs' Claim

That Madison had illegally refused to deliver judicial commissions to their rightful recipients.

Chief Lawyer for Plaintiffs

Charles Lee

Chief Defense Lawyer

Levi Lincoln, U.S. Attorney General

Justices for the Court

Samuel Chase, William Cushing, John Marshall (writing for the Court), William Paterson, Bushrod Washington

Justices Dissenting

None (Alfred Moore did not participate)

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

24 February 1803

Decision

Plaintiffs could not force Madison to deliver the commissions because the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional.

Related Cases

  • Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816).
  • Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821).
  • Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).
  • Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983).
  • Honda v. Oberg, 512 U.S. 415 (1994).

Sources

West's Encyclopedia of American Law St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998.

Marbury v. Madison: 1803 - Marbury Goes To Court, Marshall Proclaims The Doctrine Of Judicial Review, Suggestions For Further Reading [next] [back] Marbury v. Madison - Further Readings

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or