1 minute read

New York v. United States

Further Readings



  • "Constitutional Structure." Harvard Law Review, November 1992, pp. 173-83.
  • Du Pont, Pete. "Pleading the Tenth: With the Demise of Liberalism, Can Federalism be Brought Back to Life?" National Review, November 27, 1995, p. 50.
  • Handman, Christopher T. "The Doctrine of Political Accountability and Supreme Court Jurisdiction." Yale Law Journal, October 1996, p. 197.
  • Jensen, Erik M., and Jonathan L. Entin. "Commandeering, the Tenth Amendment, and the Federal Requisition Power." Constitutional Commentary, summer 1998, p. 355.
  • Johnson, John W., ed. Historic U.S. Court Cases, 1690-1990: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992.
  • Rivkin, David B., Jr., and Lee A. Casey. "Federalism (cont'd)." Commentary, December 1996, p. 47.
  • Rosenbloom, David H., and Bernard H. Ross. "Toward a New Jurisprudence of Constitutional Federalism." American Review of Public Administration, June 1998, p. 107.
  • Weiner, Richard D. "Federalism and the Disposal of Low-Level Radioactive Waste." Natural Resources Journal, winter 1994, pp. 197-223.
  • Wilson, Jerome L. "States Need a Simple Guarantee of Rights." The National Law Journal, February 13, 1995, p. A21.
  • Wise, Charles. "Judicial Federalism: The Resurgence of the Supreme Court's Role in the Protection of State Sovereignty." Public Administration Review, March-April 1998, p. 95.
  • Wise, Charles, and Rosemary O'Leary. "Intergovernmental Relations and Federalism in Environmental Management and Policy." Public Administration Review, March-April 1997, p. 150.
  • Witt, Elder. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the Supreme Court, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc., 1990.
  • ------. The Supreme Court A to Z. CQ's Encyclopedia of American Government, Rev. ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1994.

Additional topics

Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994New York v. United States - Significance, Radioactive Waste, "take-title" Provision, Dissent: Upsetting A "delicate Compromise"