Train v. City of New York
Significance, Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari, The Environmental Protection Agency
Appellant
Russell E. Train, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
Appellee
City of New York
Appellant's Claim
That the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) did not have to allot federal funds in their entirety to states according to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Robert H. Bork, U.S. Solicitor General
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
John R. Thompson
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington D.C.
Date of Decision
18 February 1975
Decision
The EPA had to disburse funds in their entirety to states seeking financial assistance under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act; Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision affirmed.
Related Cases
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit, 362 U.S. 440 (1960).
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey, 430 U.S. 141 (1977).
Sources
www.epa.gov
Further Readings
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
Additional topics
- Trimble v. Gordon - A Small But Contentious Estate, Discrimination Based On Legitimacy?, Impact, Heirs And Inheritance Laws
- Tony Boyle Trial: 1974 - Annette Gilly Confesses, Boyle Balks On Arraignment, Boyle's Secretary Spoils Defense
- Train v. City of New York - Significance
- Train v. City of New York - Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari
- Train v. City of New York - The Environmental Protection Agency
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980