Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium
Decision, Significance, Justice Breyer's Contextual Balancing Approach, Justice Kennedy's Categorical Approach
Petitioner
Denver Area Educational Consortium, et al.
Respondent
Federal Communications Commission, et al.
Petitioner's Claim
That various regulations implementing the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act, which regulated indecent and obscene programming on cable television, violated the free speech rights of cable access programmers and cable television viewers under the First Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
I. Michael Greenberger
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Lawrence G. Wallace
Justices for the Court
Stephen Breyer (writing for the Court), Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens
Justices Dissenting
William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
28 June 1996
Related Cases
- Kovacs v. Cooper, 336 U.S. 77 (1949).
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978).
- Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 492 U.S. 115 (1989).
- Turner Broadcasting Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 512 U.S. 622 (1994).
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 512 U.S. 844 (1997).
Additional topics
- Stephens Co. Duffield v. Robertson - Significance, Legislative History, Through The Looking Glass, The Controversy Continues, Further Readings
- David Brock Impeachment Trial: 2000 - The Chief Justice Impeached, Testimony On Article I, Testimony On Article 11, Testimony On Article Iv - Testimony on Article Ill
- Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium - Decision
- Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium - Further Readings
- Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium - Significance
- Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium - Justice Breyer's Contextual Balancing Approach
- Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium - Justice Kennedy's Categorical Approach
- Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium - Justice Thomas's Categorical Approach
- Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present