Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972

Oregon v. Mitchell - Significance

court congress plaintiff voting

Plaintiff

State of Oregon

Defendant

John N. Mitchell, U.S. Attorney General

Plaintiff's Claim

The attorney general should be barred from enforcing provisions of Congress' Voting Rights Act because the right to regulate elections is reserved for the states.

Chief Lawyer for Plaintiff

Lee Johnson

Chief Defense Lawyer

Erwin N. Griswold

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black (writing for the Court), Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, Potter Stewart

Justices Dissenting

William O. Douglas, John Marshall Harlan II, Thurgood Marshall, Byron R. White

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

21 December 1970

Decision

Congress could lower the voting age in federal elections to 18, but states and local governments reserved the right to set their own voting age.

Related Cases

  • Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946).
  • Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 (1960).
  • Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964).
  • Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964).

Further Readings

  • Cultice, Wendell W. Youth's Battle for the Ballot. New York: Greenwood Press, 1992.
  • Hall, Kermit L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • MacKenzie, John P. "18-Year-Old Vote For President, Congress Upheld: High Court Excludes State Races." Washington Post. 22 December 1970, pp. A1, A6.
Orzoco v. Texas - Significance, A Significant Reversal, Impact [next] [back] June Opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court (13,) (1966) - Miranda V. State Of Arizona, I., Ii., Iii., Iv., V.

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or