Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917

Guinn v. United States - Significance, Oklahoma's Grandfather Clause, A Political Decision, The Supreme Court Decides, Civil Rights And Wrongs

joseph vote regulation chief

Plaintiffs

Frank Guinn, J. J. Beal

Defendant

United States

Plaintiffs' Claim

That the federal government had been wrong to prosecute these two Oklahoma election officials for enforcing an Oklahoma voting regulation that became known as the "Grandfather clause." The government believed that the "Grandfather clause" deprived African Americans of their right to vote.

Chief Defense Lawyers

James C. McReynolds, U.S. Attorney General; John W. Davis, U.S. Solicitor General

Chief Lawyer for Plaintiff

Joseph W. Bailey

Justices for the Court

William Rufus Day, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Charles Evans Hughes, Joseph Rucker Lamar, Joseph McKenna, Mahlon Pitney, Willis Van Devanter, Edward Douglass White (writing for the Court)

Justices Dissenting

None (James Clark McReynolds did not participate)

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

21 June 1915

Decision

That the Oklahoma voting regulation did in fact violate the Fifteenth Amendment and unconstitutionally deprive African Americans of their right to vote.

Related Cases

  • United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941).
Hans Schmidt Trials: 1913 1914 - Insanity Plea, Deadlocked [next] [back] Gregorio Cortez Appeals: 1902-04 - Appeals Challenge Convictions, Convictions Upheld In Glover Shooting

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

almost 8 years ago

Oklahoma became a state in 1907, not 1908.