Fredette v. BVP Management Associates - Significance, Protecting Men In The Workplace, Same Gender Harassment Actionable, Impact

sexual court appellant sex

Appellant

Robert Fredette

Appellees

BVP Managements Associates, Royal Palace Hotel Associates, and Buena Vista Hospitality Group

Appellant's Claim

That same gender sexual harassment is prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

Tobe M. Lev

Chief Lawyer for Appellees

Arch Y. Stokes

Justices for the Court

R. Lanier Anderson III (writing for the court), Albert J. Henderson, Phyllis A. Kravitch

Judges Dissenting

None

Place

Atlanta, Georgia

Date of Decision

22 May 1997

Decision

Sexual harassment of a male employee by a male supervisor is prohibited by Title VII.

Related Cases

Johnson v. Transportation Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (1987).
Goluszek v. H. P. Smith, 697 F. Supp. 1452 (1988).
Wrightson v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc., 99 F.3d 138 (1996).
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services Incorporated et al. 118 S.Ct. 998 (1998).

Fredette v. BVP Management Associates - Significance

In ruling that same gender harassment is actionable under the Civil Rights Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit joined a number of other courts of appeals in expanding the protections afforded workers in the workplace. Shortly after the court's decision, the U.S. Supreme Court also ruled that same gender harassment is prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. By the early…

Fredette v. BVP Management Associates - Protecting Men In The Workplace

Beginning in the late 1980s and continuing through the 1990s, a new social movement began to take shape and gain momentum in the United States. During this time, there began an increased awareness of discrimination against men, and in particular against homosexual men. As the public and the courts became more aware of this discrimination, the courts were asked to consider to what extent Title VII …

Fredette v. BVP Management Associates - Same Gender Harassment Actionable

Fredette appealed the district court's decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which reversed the district court. Joining a number of other courts of appeals, the Eleventh Circuit rejected the approach taken by the district court and the cases upon which the district court relied. The court relied on cases involving sexual advances by a male supervisor toward a female emplo…

Citing this material

Please include a link to this page if you have found this material useful for research or writing a related article. Content on this website is from high-quality, licensed material originally published in print form. You can always be sure you're reading unbiased, factual, and accurate information.

Highlight the text below, right-click, and select “copy”. Paste the link into your website, email, or any other HTML document.