O'Connor v. Donaldson - Significance, Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, Further Readings
court william petitioner rights
Petitioner
Kenneth Donaldson
Respondent
Dr. J. B. O'Connor
Petitioner's Claim
That O'Connor, as the representative of the Florida State Hospital at Chattahoochee, had violated Donaldson's constitutional rights by keeping him in custody against his will for nearly 15 years for his supposed mental illness.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Raymond W. Gearney
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Bruce J. Ennis, Jr.
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart (writing for the Court), Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
26 June 1975
Decision
In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Donaldson possessed certain constitutional rights, and that he could gather damages from individuals who had taken away his rights.
Related Cases
- Minnesota ex rel Pearson v. Probate Court, 309 U.S. 270 (1940).
- Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 (1960).
- In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967).
- Cohen v. Caligornia, 403 U.S. 15 (1971).
- McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528 (1971).
Sources
Department of Education. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, http://www.civilrights.com/idea.html, www.edweek.org/context/glossary/idea.htm.
User Comments
5 months ago
M. Zabezensky, Ph. D.
Does a civilized society not have the authority to protect its members from potential threats to its members by intervening and confining dangerous members in human warehouses?
The American Constitution is not a suicide pact, but a social compact.