Cammermeyer v. Aspin
Significance, A Military Discharge, Summary Judgment, Legitimate But Not Rational, Impact
Plaintiff
Margarethe Cammermeyer, Colonel
Defendants
Les Aspin, U.S. Secretary of Defense, et al.
Plaintiff's Claim
That her discharge from service in the National Guard--based solely on her statement that she is a lesbian--was in violation of her constitutional rights.
Chief Lawyers for Plaintiff
Jeffrey I. Tilden, Michael H. Himes, Mary Newcombe
Chief Defense Lawyer
David M. Glass
Judge
Thomas Zilly
Place
Seattle, Washington
Date of Decision
1 June 1994
Decision
Cammermeyer's discharge violated her equal protection and substantive due process rights but not her right to freedom of speech and association.
Related Cases
- Meinhold v. U.S. Dept. of Defense, 34 F.3d 1469 (1994).
- McVeigh v. Cohen, 983 F.Supp. 215 (1997).
Further Readings
- Cammermeyer, Margarethe, with Chris Fisher. Service in Silence. New York: Viking, 1994.
- "Lesbians, Long Overlooked, Are Central to Debate on Military Ban." New York Times, 4 May 1993.
- Shenon, Philip. "Armed Forces Still Question Homosexuals." New York Times, 27 February 1996.
- Shilts, Randy. Conduct Unbecoming. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993.
Additional topics
- Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette - A Symbol Of Hatred Or Religious Display?, Impact, Further Readings
- California v. Hodari D. - Significance, When Questioning Is Seizure, An Erosion Of Fourth Amendment Rights?, Impact
- Cammermeyer v. Aspin - Significance
- Cammermeyer v. Aspin - A Military Discharge
- Cammermeyer v. Aspin - Summary Judgment
- Cammermeyer v. Aspin - Legitimate But Not Rational
- Cammermeyer v. Aspin - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994