Rust v. Sullivan
Significance, Supreme Court Rejects Challenges To The "gag Rule" On Federally Funded Family Planning Clinics
Petitioners
Irving Rust, et al.
Respondent
Louis W. Sullivan, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Petitioners' Claim
That federal regulations forbidding family planning clinics from providing their clients with information about abortion violate both the right to freedom of speech and a woman's right to abortion.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioners
Laurence H. Tribe
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Kenneth W. Starr, U.S. Solicitor General
Justices for the Court
Anthony M. Kennedy, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
Harry A. Blackmun, Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor, John Paul Stevens
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
23 May 1991
Decision
The Supreme Court upheld the new federal regulations.
Related Cases
- Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
- Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980).
- Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 462 U.S. 416 (1983).
- Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 476 U.S. 747 (1986).
- Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 492 U.S. 490 (1989).
Further Readings
- LaMarche, Gara, ed. Speech & Equality: Do We Really Have to Choose? New York, NY: New York University Press, 1996.
- Reagan. Leslie J. When Abortion Was a Crime: Women, Medicine, and Law in the United States, 1876-1973. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.
- Yarnold, Barbara M. Abortion Politics in the Federal Courts: Right Versus Right. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1995.
Additional topics
- Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois - Significance, State Workers Challenge The System, Another Blow To Patronage
- Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co. - Significance, Related Cases, Further Readings
- Rust v. Sullivan - Significance
- Rust v. Sullivan - Supreme Court Rejects Challenges To The "gag Rule" On Federally Funded Family Planning Clinics
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994