Other Free Encyclopedias :: Law Library - American Law and Legal Information :: Great American Court Cases Vol 14 :: Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health - Further Readings

Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health - Further Readings

Abortion and the States: Political Change and Future Regulation. Chicago: American Bar Association, 1993.
Abortion Decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. Beverly Hills, CA: Excellent Books, 1993.
Benshoof, Janet. "Abortion Rights and Wrongs: Undue Burdens--The Rhetoricis Pro-`Roe,' But the Reality is Anti-Choice." The Nation, October 14, 1996, p. 19.
Benshoof, Janet. "Planned Parenthood v. Casey: The Impact of the New Undue Burden Standard on Reproductive Health Care." JAMA, The Journal of the American Medical Association, May 5, 1993, p. 2249.
Ford, John Christopher. "The Casey Standard for Evaluating Facial Attackson Abortion Statutes." Michigan Law Review, March 1997, p. 1443.
Goldstein, Leslie Friedman. Contemporary Cases in Women's Rights.Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1994.

Citing this material

Please include a link to this page if you have found this material useful for research or writing a related article. Content on this website is from high-quality, licensed material originally published in print form. You can always be sure you're reading unbiased, factual, and accurate information.

Highlight the text below, right-click, and select “copy”. Paste the link into your website, email, or any other HTML document.

<a href="http://law.jrank.org/pages/13312/Akron-v-Akron-Center-Reproductive-Health-Further-Readings.html">Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health - Further Readings</a>

Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health - Further Readings

Citing this material

User Comments Add a comment…