Buck v. Bell

Appellant
Carrie Buck
Appellee
Dr. J. H. Bell
Appellant's Claim
That Virginia's eugenic sterilization law violated Carrie Buck's constitutional rights.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Irving Whitehead
Chief Defense Lawyer
Aubrey E. Strode
Justices for the Court
Louis D. Brandeis, Oliver Wendell Holmes (writing for the Court), James ClarkMcReynolds, Edward Terry Sanford, Harlan Fiske Stone, George Sutherland, William Howard Taft, Willis Van Devanter
Justices Dissenting
Pierce Butler
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
2 May 1927
Decision
Upheld as constitutional Virginia's compulsory sterilization of young women considered "unfit [to] continue their kind".
Significance
Virginia's law served as a model for similar laws in 30 states, under which 50,000 U.S. citizens were sterilized without their consent. During the Nuremberg war trials, Nazi lawyers cited Buck v. Bell as acceptable precedentfor the sterilization of 2 million people in its "Rassenhygiene" (race hygiene) program.
The Supreme Court's decision in Buck v. Bell resulted in only one letter of sympathy to the soon-to-be sterilized Carrie Buck and surprisingly little newspaper coverage. Oliver Wendell Holmes, who wrote the decision, had nosecond thoughts. As he wrote in a letter later that month, "One decision . .. gave me pleasure, establishing the constitutionality of a law permitting the sterilization of imbeciles." The decision had far-reaching and disastrous consequences, however, not only for Carrie Buck--who was not "feebleminded" orretarded--but for many other similarly sterilized individuals and the peoples involved in World War II.
Emma Buck was the widowed mother of three small children, whom she supportedthrough prostitution and with the help of charity until they were taken fromher. On 1 April 1920, she was brought before Charlottesville, Virginia Justice of the Peace Charles D. Shackleford. After a cursory interview, Shacklefordcommitted Emma Buck to the Virginia Colony for Epileptics and Feebleminded,in Lynchburg, Virginia.
At the age of three, Emma Buck's daughter Carrie had joined the family of J.T. and Alice Dobbs. Her school records indicate a normal progression throughfive years, until she was withdrawn from school by the Dobbs so that she could assume more of the family's housework. The Dobbs were completely satisfieduntil Carrie turned 17. Then, during what Carrie claimed was a rape by the Dobbs' son, she became pregnant.
The Dobbs brought Carrie before Shackleford and asked him to commit her to the Colony for the Epileptic and Feebleminded, as he had her mother. The Dobbsand their family doctor testified that Carrie was feebleminded; a second doctor agreed. That same day, 24 January 1924, Shackleford signed the order committing the second member of the Buck family to the state colony. The Dobbs institutionalized Carrie as soon as her daughter Vivian was born; they then raised the infant as their own.
Virginia Approaches its Courts with a "Solution"
Dr. Albert Priddy, the first superintendent of the colony, advocated eugenics--the controlled mating of humans to "improve" the species--as society's bestresponse to the presence of those he called "mental defectives." In the seven years prior to Carrie Buck's arrival, he had sterilized 75 to 100 young women without their consent, claiming that he had operated to cure "pelvic disease." In 1924 the Virginia Assembly adopted an bill permitting the forced sterilization of "feebleminded" or "socially inadequate person[s]." It had been prepared by Aubrey Strode, a state legislator and chief administrator of the Colony for the Epileptic and Feebleminded. Strode had worked from a model sterilization act drafted by American eugenicist Harry H. Laughlin, who considered compulsory sterilization to be "the practical application of those fundamental biological and social principles which determine the racial endowments and the racial health--physical, mental and spiritual--of future generations."
Carrie Buck as a Test Case
On 19 November 1924, Buck v. Priddy was argued before Judge Bennett Gordon in the Circuit Court of Amherst County. Aubrey Strode represented Dr. Priddy, who had come to have Buck declared feebleminded and suitable for compulsory sterilization. Irving Whitehead, a lifelong friend to Strode and one ofthe first board members of the colony, represented Buck in a manner that seems to have been halfhearted. Whitehead's fee was paid by the colony.
Anne Harris, a Charlottesville district nurse, was the first witness. She testified that "Emma Buck, Carrie Buck's mother . . . was living in the worst neighborhoods, and that she was not able to, or would not, work and support herchildren, and that they were on the streets more or less."
Strode asked, "What about the character of her offspring?"
Harris replied, "Well, I don't know anything very definite about the children, except they don't seem to be able to do any more than their mother."
Strode pounced. "Well, that is the crux of the matter. Are they mentally normal children?"
And Harris responded, "No, sir, they are not."
Harris then admitted during Whitehead's cross examination: "I really know very little about Carrie after she left her mother [at age 3]. Before that timeshe was most too small."
Three teachers testified about Carrie's sister, brother, and cousin, using descriptions such as "dull in her books."
There was additional testimony about several of Carrie's other relatives, oneof whom was described as "right peculiar." The testimony did not relate to Carrie herself until Caroline Wilhelm--a Red Cross social worker contacted bythe Dobbs family during Carrie's pregnancy, took the stand.
Strode asked Wilhelm, "From your experience as a social worker, if Carrie were discharged from the Colony still capable of child-bearing, is she likely tobecome the parent of deficient offspring?"
Wilhelm replied, "I should judge so. I think a girl of her mentality is moreor less at the mercy of other people . . . Her mother had three illegitimatechildren, and I should say that Carrie would be very likely to have illegitimate children."
Strode concluded, "So that the only way that she could likely be kept from increasing her own kind would be by either segregation or something that wouldstop her power to propagate."
Wilhelm next testified about Carrie's daughter, Vivian "It seems difficult tojudge probabilities of child as young as that [eight months], but it seems to me not quite a normal baby."
Whitehead, on cross-examination, raised what should have been a pivotal point: "The question of pregnancy is not evidence of feeblemindedness, is it? Thefact that, as we say, she made a miss-step [sic]--went wrong--is that evidence of feeblemindedness?"
Wilhelm replied, "No, but a feebleminded girl is much more likely to go wrong."
Arthur Estabrook of the Carnegie Institute of Washington testified, discussing his 14 years of genetic research and his studies of "groups of mental defectives." Of his conclusions in The Jukes in 1915, a study of one familyover four years, he said, "The result of the study was to show that certaindefinite laws of heredity were being shown by the family, in that the feeblemindedness was being inherited . . . and . . . was the basis of the antisocialconduct, showing up in the criminality and the pauperism."
Spode asked, "From what you know of Carrie Buck, would you say that by the laws of heredity she is a feeble-minded person and probably the potential parent of socially inadequate offspring likewise afflicted?"
And Estabrook replied, "I would."
Dr. Priddy testified last. Carrie Buck, he said, "would cease to be a chargeon society if sterilized. It would remove one potential source of the incalculable number of descendants who would be feebleminded. She would contribute to the raising of the general mental average and standard [by not reproducing]."
And, finally, Harry H. Laughlin's deposition was read into the court record.Dr. Priddy had written Laughlin, describing Carrie and asking for Laughlin'shelp in enforcing the sterilization law against her. The information contained in Dr. Priddy's own letter forms the basis of Laughlin's sworn testimony: Carrie, he wrote, has "a mental age of 9 years, . . . a record during her lifeof immorality, prostitution, and untruthfulness; has never been self-sustaining; has one illegitimate child, now about six months old and supposed to bementally defective . . . She is . . . a potential parent of socially inadequate or defective offspring." There is no evidence that Carrie Buck was examined by Laughlin.
In February of 1925, Judge Gordon upheld the Virginia sterilization law and ordered the sterilization of Carrie Buck. Irving Whitehead appealed to the Virginia Court of Appeals. (The case was now Buck v. Bell because Dr. Priddy had died a few weeks earlier and Dr. J. H. Bell had taken his place at the colony.) The appeals court decision upheld the circuit court decision.
Supreme Court Reviews Case
In the brief he submitted to the Supreme Court, Whitehead claimed FourteenthAmendment protection of a person's "full bodily integrity." He also predicated the "worst kind of tyranny" if there were no "limits of the power of the state (which, in the end, is nothing more than the faction in control of the government) to rid itself of those citizens deemed undesirable." Strode, in contrast, likened compulsory sterilization to compulsory vaccination.
Justice Holmes delivered the nearly unanimous opinion on 2 May 1927:

We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the state for their lesser sacrifices, often felt to be much by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swampedwith incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. Theprinciple that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes.

Only Justice Butler dissented. Carrie Buck was sterilized by Dr. Bell on 19 October 1927. Shortly thereafter, she was paroled from the Virginia colony. She married twice: William Davis Eagle in 1932 and, after his death, Charlie Detamore. The letters she wrote to the Virginia colony seeking custody of her mother, as well as the recollections of her own minister, neighbors and healthcare providers, belie the notion that Carrie Buck was "feebleminded" or retarded.
Other Applications Result from Buck v. Bell
Laws similar to the Virginia statutes were passed in 30 other states, leadingto the forcible sterilization of more than 50,000 people, including Carrie Buck's sister Doris.
Harry L. Laughlin, author of the model sterilization act adapted by Aubrey Strode for Virginia, made his draft available to state and foreign governments,and his model became Germany's Hereditary Health Law in 1933. In appreciation, he was awarded an honorary degree from Heidelberg University in 1936. After World War II, defending the forcible sterilization of 2 million people, Nazi lawyers cited this law and pointed out that the U.S. Supreme Court, in Buck v. Bell, had declared such laws constitutional.
Buck v. Bell has yet to be reversed by the Supreme Court. In 1973, Roe v. Wade guaranteed women the right to make their own decisions concerning abortion during the first two trimesters of pregnancy. The decision, written by Justice Harry Blackmun, balances the interests of the state and the woman and finds in favor of the woman's right of privacy. Nonetheless, citingBuck v. Bell, Justice Blackmun specifically denies "the claim . . . that one has an unlimited right to do with one's body as one pleases."
Related Cases

• Matter of Romero, 790 P.2d 819 (1990).
  
• Fieger v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 740 (1996).

Eugenics
Eugenics is a social and scientific theory that promotes the improvement of the human race through selective breeding. The idea became popular during thelate nineteenth century; Sir Francis Galton is recognized as the "intellectual father of modern eugenics"; Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution by NaturalSelection in 1859 introduced the concepts behind eugenics.
Eugenics concepts have been applied in many different ways. One program may seek to increase the number of individuals with positive genetic traits, suchas high intelligence and physical strength. In the United States and Europe,several thousand children are born annually to women artificially inseminatedwith donor sperm of men possessing these qualities.
A program seeking to reduce the number of members of society with major genetic problems may involve the mandatory sterilization of persons exhibiting such handicaps, thereby preventing reproduction. This is a negative eugenic program. Hitler's program to wipe out the Jewish people during World War II was perhaps the most terrible example of negative eugenics.
Scientific advances in in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, and other fertility methods may increase the control a society has in determining the characteristics of future generations.
Sources
Encarta, http://encarta.msn.com/index/conciseindex/22/02247000.htm. Grolier Electronic Publishing, Inc.