Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940

Buck v. Bell - Significance, Virginia Approaches Its Courts With A "solution", Carrie Buck As A Test Case

sterilization constitutional appellant encarta

Appellant

Carrie Buck

Appellee

Dr. J. H. Bell

Appellant's Claim

That Virginia's eugenic sterilization law violated Carrie Buck's constitutional rights.

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

Irving Whitehead

Chief Defense Lawyer

Aubrey E. Strode

Justices for the Court

Louis D. Brandeis, Oliver Wendell Holmes (writing for the Court), James Clark McReynolds, Edward Terry Sanford, Harlan Fiske Stone, George Sutherland, William Howard Taft, Willis Van Devanter

Justices Dissenting

Pierce Butler

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

2 May 1927

Decision

Upheld as constitutional Virginia's compulsory sterilization of young women considered "unfit [to] continue their kind".

Related Cases

  • Matter of Romero, 790 P.2d 819 (1990).
  • Fieger v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 740 (1996).

Sources

Encarta, http://encarta.msn.com/index/conciseindex/22/02247000.htm. Grolier Electronic Publishing, Inc.

Further Readings

  • Cushman, Robert F. Cases in Constitutional Law, 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 1984.
  • Smith, J. David, and K. Ray Nelson. The Sterilization of Carrie Buck: Was She Feebleminded or Society's Pawn. Far Hills, NJ: New Horizon Press, 1989.
Buck v. Bell: 1927 - Virginia Approaches Its Courts With A "solution", Carrie Buck As A Test Case, Supreme Court Reviews Case [next] [back] Bruno Richard Hauptmann Trial: 1935 - Discovered Through Ransom Money, The Circus Comes To Town, Everything Matches, The Shoebox On The Shelf

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or