Additional Topics
The ruling recognized flexibility lower state courts have in trying violent juvenile offenders as adults. The case characterized the responsiveness of state governments, including court systems, to public demands for toughening punishment measures of violent and destructive crimes, even when performed by youths. To many the juvenile justice system had fallen into chaos toward the end of the twenti…
In August of 1996 a 15-year-old juvenile, known as T. D. R., broke into a woman's home. He forced the woman into a bedroom where at knife point he sexually assaulted her. Before leaving, T. D. R. cut off the victim's hair and forced her into a closet. Upon apprehension, the state of North Carolina filed a juvenile petition alleging T. D. R. a delinquent as a result of committing first-degree rape …
The Supreme Court of North Carolina reversed the court of appeal's ruling. Chief Justice Mitchell, writing for the court, found that the court of appeals had authority to hear any direct appeal in a juvenile transfer order, not just those with final decisions. Since the juvenile transfer order terminated district court jurisdiction by sending the case to a superior court, the district court action…
Criminal punishment became increasingly politicized in the 1990s. Trying children as adults was often justified on grounds that teens who committed violent crimes should receive punishment comparable to their crimes. In addition, it was believed by many that stiff penalties served as deterrents to other teens who might commit murder or other serious crimes. The prospect of serving life with harden…
Citing this material
Please include a link to this page if you have found this material useful for research or writing a related article. Content on this website is from high-quality, licensed material originally published in print form. You can always be sure you're reading unbiased, factual, and accurate information.
Highlight the text below, right-click, and select “copy”. Paste the link into your website, email, or any other HTML document.
User Comments
about 4 years ago
I started doing some research for a school project in this subject of teens tried as adults. I didnt realize how deep into this subject i would become! i just wish someon could explain how a teen my age(17)and even younger can be tried as an adult but cannot be privledged the same awards as adults. For examople i can be tried for life but cant even vote, i could be living with women twice my age who will molest and beat me but i cant even drink a beer. please explain how teens can be punished like adults but not recognized as adults. Is the only time we get recognition as adults is if we kill an old couple????