Afroyim v. Rusk
Significance
Petitioner
Afroyim
Respondent
Dean Rusk, U.S. Secretary of State
Petitioner's Claim
Section 401(e) of the Nationality Act of 1940, 8 U.S.C. sec. 801 (1946), which provided that American citizens automatically lost their citizenship if they voted in a foreign election, was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Edward J. Ennis
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Charles Gordon
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black (writing for the Court), William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, Earl Warren
Justices Dissenting
Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
29 May 1967
Decision
Held that the Fourteenth Amendment prevents Congress from adopting any laws divesting American citizens of their citizenship.
Related Cases
- Perez v. Brownell, 356 U.S. 44 (1958).
- Bellei v. Rusk, 296 F.Supp 1247 (DCDC 1969).
- Vance v. Terrazas, 444 U.S. 252 (1980).
Further Readings
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1996.
- Miller, John J. "Loyalty Duel: Will the Rise of Dual Citizenship Create a World Without Patriotism?" National Review, May 18, 1998, p. 32.
Additional topics
- Albert Henry DeSalvo Trial: 1967 - Sanity Hearing, Final Arguments
- Adderley v. Florida - Significance, Impact, Further Readings
- Afroyim v. Rusk - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972