Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994

Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls - Significance, Women And Children First, Defining "business Necessity", "outright And Explicit" Discrimination

petitioners policy chief fetal

Petitioners

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW, et al.

Respondent

Johnson Controls, Inc.

Petitioners' Claim

That Johnson Controls' "fetal protection policy" is sex discrimination prohibited by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA).

Chief Lawyer for Petitioners

Marsha S. Berzon

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Stanley S. Jaspan

Justices for the Court

Harry A. Blackmun (writing for the Court), Anthony M. Kennedy, Thurgood Marshall, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

None

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

20 March 1991

Decision

Johnson Controls' fetal protection policy was in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the PDA.

Related Cases

  • Ward's Cove Packing v. Atonio, 490 U.S. 642 (1989).
  • Radovanic v. Centex Real Estate Corporation, 767 F.Supp. 1322 (W.D.N.C. 1991).
  • Krauel v. Iowa Methodist Medical Center, 95 F.3d 674 (1996).

Sources

West's Encyclopedia of American Law. St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998.

Baby Jessica Case: 1993 - Biological Mother Regrets Adoption, The Battle Over Jessica Continues [next] [back] Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce - Case Background, Dissenting Opinions

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or