Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994

Inc. v. Kay R.I.S.E. - Significance, The King And Queen Landfill Dilemma, Community Mobilization, Impact, Further Readings

plaintiff lawyer disproportionate racially

Plaintiff

Residents Involved in Saving the Environment, Inc., and others

Defendant

King and Queen County Board of Supervisors consisting of five members: R. A. Kay, Jr., R. H. Bourne, J. R. Walton, R. F. Alsop, and W. L. Hickman

Plaintiff's Claim

That placing a landfill in a predominantly African American area results in a racially disproportionate impact and violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.

Chief Lawyer for Plaintiff

Sa'ad El-Amin

Chief Defense Lawyer

John Granville Douglass

Judge

Richard L. Williams (writing for the court)

Place

Richmond, Virginia

Date of Decision

21 June 1991

Decision

Ruled in favor of the Virginia county and allowed the project to proceed by finding that the racially disproportionate impact was not intentional.

Related Cases

  • Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926).
  • Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976).
  • Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp., 429 U.S. 252 (1977).
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul - Fighting Words, The Lower Court's Rule, The Supreme Court Rules, Further Readings [next] [back] Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey - Significance, Win Some, Lose Some, The Dark Horse, Massachusetts's Abortion Consent Act

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or