United Steelworkers of America v. Weber - Significance, The Court Reverses, Is It 1984 Yet?, Impact, Related Cases, Civil Rights Act Of 1964
petitioner plan title decision
Petitioner
United Steelworkers of America
Respondent
Brian Weber
Petitioner's Claim
That an affirmative action program implemented by Kaiser Aluminum, in voluntary agreement with the United Steelworkers, did not violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Michael E. Gottesman
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Michael R. Fontham
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Thurgood Marshall, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
Warren E. Burger, William H. Rehnquist (Lewis F. Powell, Jr. and John Paul Stevens did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
27 June 1979
Decision
Maintained the legality of the affirmative action plan, and reversed the ruling of two lower courts, which had held that the plan violated Title VII.
Sources
Abraham, Henry J. and Barbara A. Perry. Freedom & The Court: Civil Rights & Liberties in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
User Comments