United Steelworkers of America v. Weber
Significance, The Court Reverses, Is It 1984 Yet?, Impact, Related Cases, Civil Rights Act Of 1964
Petitioner
United Steelworkers of America
Respondent
Brian Weber
Petitioner's Claim
That an affirmative action program implemented by Kaiser Aluminum, in voluntary agreement with the United Steelworkers, did not violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Michael E. Gottesman
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Michael R. Fontham
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Thurgood Marshall, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
Warren E. Burger, William H. Rehnquist (Lewis F. Powell, Jr. and John Paul Stevens did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
27 June 1979
Decision
Maintained the legality of the affirmative action plan, and reversed the ruling of two lower courts, which had held that the plan violated Title VII.
Sources
Abraham, Henry J. and Barbara A. Perry. Freedom & The Court: Civil Rights & Liberties in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Additional topics
- University of California v. Bakke - Significance, Reverse Discrimination Claimed, Further Readings
- United States v. Santana - Significance, A Drug Bust, Charges And Preliminary Trials, Search And Seizure, Impact
- United Steelworkers of America v. Weber - Further Readings
- United Steelworkers of America v. Weber - Significance
- United Steelworkers of America v. Weber - The Court Reverses
- United Steelworkers of America v. Weber - Is It 1984 Yet?
- United Steelworkers of America v. Weber - Impact
- United Steelworkers of America v. Weber - Related Cases
- United Steelworkers of America v. Weber - Civil Rights Act Of 1964
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980