Ex Parte Endo
Significance, Petition And Appeal Stretch Over 21 Months, Confined Under Armed Guard, Further Readings
Appellant
Mitsuye Endo
Appellee
United States
Appellant's Claim
That she was unlawfully held at an interment camp.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
James C. Purcell
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Charles Fahey, U.S. Solicitor General
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William O. Douglas (writing for the Court), Felix Frankfurter, Robert H. Jackson, Frank Murphy, Stanley Forman Reed, Owen Josephus Roberts, Wiley Blount Rutledge, Harlan Fiske Stone
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
18 December 1944
Decision
Reversed the judgment and remanded the cause district court.
Related Cases
- Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942).
- Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943).
- Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944).
Additional topics
- Ex Parte Endo Trial: 1944 - Petition And Appeal Stretch Over 21 Months, Confined Under Armed Guard, Suggestions For Further Reading
- Everson v. Board of Education - Significance, Public And Private School Busing, Further Readings
- Ex Parte Endo - Significance
- Ex Parte Endo - Further Readings
- Ex Parte Endo - Petition And Appeal Stretch Over 21 Months
- Ex Parte Endo - Confined Under Armed Guard
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953