United States v. Wong Kim Ark
The Locked Golden Gate, A Successful Writ, A Question Of Birthright, Further Readings
Appellant
United States
Appellee
Wong Kim Ark
Appellant's Claim
That the U.S. district court's affirmation of Wong's citizenship was in error.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
Solicitor General Holmes Conrad, George D. Collins
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Thomas D. Riordan
Justices for the Court
David Josiah Brewer, Henry Billings Brown, Horace Gray (writing for the Court), Rufus Wheeler Peckham, George Shiras, Jr., Edward Douglass White
Justices Dissenting
Melville Weston Fuller, John Marshall Harlan I (Joseph McKenna did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
28 March 1898
Decision
In favor of appellee Wong.
Significance
This was the first case in which the Court interpreted Section I of the Fourteenth Amendment, in which all persons born in the United States are defined as citizens.
Related Cases
- Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886).
- Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303 (1979).
Additional topics
- Vosburg v. Putney: 1890 - A Kick Rebounds, "a Peculiar Suit", Litigation Continues
- United States v. Winans - Significance, Court Sides With The Yakimas
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - The Locked Golden Gate
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Further Readings
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - A Successful Writ
- United States v. Wong Kim Ark - A Question Of Birthright
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1883 to 1917