Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present

Washington v. Glucksberg - Significance, Washington Law Challenged, Jack Kevorkian, Further Readings

petitioner ban court suicide

Petitioner

State of Washington

Respondent

Harold Glucksberg

Petitioner's Claim

That Washington's ban on assisting or aiding a suicide does not violate the Due Process Clause of the Constitution.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

William L. Williams, Senior Assistant Attorney General of Washington

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Kathryn L. Tucker

Justices for the Court

Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas

Justices Dissenting

None

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

26 June 1997

Decision

That Washington's ban on assisted suicide does not violate the constitutional rights of terminally ill patients.

Related Cases

  • Moore v. East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494 (1977).
  • Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990).

Sources

Cheyfitz, Kirk. "He Breaks His Own Rules: Kevorkian Rushes to Fulfill His Clients' Desire to Die." Detroit Free Press, 3 March 1997.

Whren v. United States - Significance, A Routine Traffic Stop?, Lower Court Rulings, Use Of Pretext To Enable A Search [next] [back] Waneta Hoyt Trial: 1995 - Searching For The Truth, The Trial, Suggestions For Further Reading

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or