Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994

Missouri Department of Health Cruzan v. Director - Significance, The Accident, Who Decides?, Defining Life, Court Rejects Parents' Appeal, Discontinuance Of Life-support V. Assisted Suicide

petitioner william decision food


Nancy Beth Cruzan, by her parents and co-guardians, Lester L. Cruzan, et ux.


Director, Missouri Department of Health, et al.

Petitioner's Claim

That the state of Missouri had no authority to interfere with the parents' wish to remove the tube that supplied food and water to Nancy Cruzan.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

William H. Colby

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Robert L. Presson, Attorney General of Missouri

Justices for the Court

Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Antonin Scalia, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting

Harry A. Blackmun, William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens


Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

25 June 1990


The Court upheld the Missouri State Supreme Court's decision rejecting the Cruzans' petition to withdraw food and water from their daughter.

Related Cases

  • In the Matter of Quinlan, 355 A.2d 647 (1976).
  • Compassion In Dying v. State of Washington, 49 F.3d 586 (1995).


Constitutional Law: Thirteenth Edition New York City, NY: The Foundation Press Inc., 1997.

Further Readings

  • Kinsley, Michael. "To Be Or Not to Be." New Republic, 27 November 1989, p. 6.
  • "Right-to-Die Case Argued." Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report, 9 December 1989, p. 3370.
  • Sanders, Alain L. "Whose Right to Die?" Time, 11 December 1990, p. 80.
  • Urofsky, Melvin I. Letting Go: Death, Dying, and the Law. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1993.
Inc. v. CompuServe Cubby Inc. - Significance, Impact, Regulation Of The Internet [next] [back] Crown Heights Trials: 1992 1997 - A Bloody Knife And A Riot, "why Did You Stab Me?", Civil Rights Charges Brought

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

almost 8 years ago

You should include the Justices opinions.

Vote down Vote up

over 3 years ago

spread by butt cheeks with butter