Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980

In the Matter of Quinlan - Significance, Accepted Standards Vs. Right To Die, Decision Is Appealed, Do States That Allow Assisted Suicide Find An Increase In Intentional Suicide Rates?

jersey plaintiff karen hospital


Joseph T. Quinlan


St. Clare's Hospital

Plaintiff's Claim

That doctors at St. Clare's Hospital should obey Mr. Quinlan's instructions to disconnect his comatose daughter from her respirator and allow her to die.

Chief Lawyers for Plaintiff

Paul W. Armstrong, James Crowley

Chief Defense Lawyers

Ralph Porzio (for Karen Quinlan's physicians), Theodore Einhorn (for the hospital), New Jersey State Attorney General William F. Hyland, Morris County Prosecutor Donald G. Collester, Jr.


Robert Muir, Jr.


Morristown, New Jersey

Date of Decision

10 November 1975


Denied Mr. Quinlan the right to authorize termination of "life-assisting apparatus" and granted Karen Quinlan's physicians the right to continue medical treatment over the objections of the Quinlan family. Overturned by the New Jersey Supreme Court, which, on 31 March 1976, ruled that Karen's "right of privacy" included a right to refuse medical treatment and that her father, under the circumstances, could assume this right in her stead.

Related Cases

  • Garger v. New Jersey, 429 U.S. 922 (1976).
  • Matter of Conroy, 486 A.2d 1209 (1985).


Oregon Center for Health Statistics (State Department of Health).

In re Primus - Significance [next] [back] In the Matter of Karen Ann Quinlan: 1975 - Accepted Standards Vs. Right To Die, Decision Is Appealed, Suggestions For Further Reading

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or