Morton v. Mancari
Significance, Preferences And The Fifth Amendment, Native Americans Not Ethnic, Impact
Appellant
Rogers Clark Morton, U.S. Secretary of Interior
Appellee
Mancari, et al.
Appellant's Claim
That the federal government's use of Native American preferences in personnel decisions did not violate equal protection under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Appellant
Harry R. Sachse
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Gene E. Franchini
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun (writing for the Court), William J. Brennan, Jr., Warren E. Burger, William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist, Potter Stewart, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
17 June 1974
Decision
Upheld the United States' claim and overturned a lower court's decision prohibiting use of Native American preferences in governmental personnel hiring and job promotion practices.
Related Cases
- Board of County Commissioners v. Seber, 318 U.S. 705 (1943).
- United States v. Antelope, 430 U.S. 641 (1977).
- County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation, 470 U.S. 226 (1985).
- Traynor v. Turnage, 485 U.S. 535 (1988).
Further Readings
- Getches, David H., Charles F. Wilkinson, and Robert A. Williams, Jr. Cases and Materials on Federal Indian Law, 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 1993.
- Williams, David C. "The Borders of the Equal Protection Clause: Indians as Peoples." U.C.L.A. Law Review, Vol. 38, 1991, pp. 759-870.
Additional topics
- Murray R. Gold Trials: 1976-92 - A Former Son-in-law, A Dead Culprit?, Second Trial, … Waving In The Wind"
- Moore v. East Cleveland - Sanctity Of The Family, The Dissenting Opinions, Impact
- Morton v. Mancari - Significance
- Morton v. Mancari - Preferences And The Fifth Amendment
- Morton v. Mancari - Native Americans Not Ethnic
- Morton v. Mancari - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980