Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present

Vernonia School District v. Acton (47J) - Significance, Stimulus, Response, An Invasion Of Privacy?, In Loco Parentis, Impact, Teenagers And The Availability Of Drugs

court petitioner washington john

Petitioner

Vernonia School District 47J

Respondent

Wayne Acton, et al.

Petitioner's Claim

That a school policy mandating random drug testing for participants in interscholastic athletic programs did not violate Fourth Amendment prohibitions against illegal search and seizure.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Timothy R. Volpert, John A. Matterazzo, Davis Wright Tremaine

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Thomas M. Christ, John A. Wittmayer, Steven R. Shapiro

Justices for the Court

Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Anthony M. Kennedy, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia (writing for the Court), Clarence Thomas

Justices Dissenting

Sandra Day O'Connor, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

26 June 1995

Decision

Upheld the school district's claim, vacating a judgement by the court of appeals and remanding the case for further proceedings in the court of appeals consistent with a finding that Vernonia's student athlete drug testing policy did not violate Fourth Amendment prohibitions against unreasonable search and seizure.

Related Cases

  • Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979).
  • New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985).
  • Skinner v. Railway Executives' Association, 489 U.S. 602 (1989).

Sources

Bureau of Justice Statistics Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics--1996. Washington, DC: U.S. Government, 1997.

Further Readings

  • Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt, eds. Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court, 3rd ed. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc., 1990.
  • Legal Information Institute and Project Hermes. http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/94590.ZS.html.
Vincent Doan Trial: 1997 - Culberson's Disappearance, Past Physical Abuse [next] [back] Vacco v. Quill - A Two-edged Sword, Equal Protection?, Omission And Commission, Impact, States That Allow Assisted Suicide

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or