Soldal v. Cook County
Significance, Impact, The Plain View Exception
Petitioner
Edward Soldal et ux.
Respondent
Cook County, Illinois, et al.
Petitioner's Claim
The seizure and removal of their mobile home by a property manager, overseen by police officers, was a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
John L. Stainthorp
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Kenneth L. Gillis
Justices for the Court
Stephen Breyer, Anthony M. Kennedy, Sandra Day O'Connor, William H. Rehnquist, Antonin Scalia, David H. Souter, John Paul Stevens, Clarence Thomas, Byron R. White (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
8 December 1992
Decision
The Fourth Amendment protects persons from deprivations of property such as the one that occurred in this case.
Related Cases
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967).
- Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967).
- United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983).
- United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109 (1984).
Sources
Levy, Leonard W., ed. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
Further Readings
- New York Times, December 9, 1992.
- West's Encyclopedia of American Law. St. Paul: West Group, 1998.
Additional topics
- Stanford v. Kentucky - Significance, Court Declares That Capital Punishment May Be Imposed On Those Over Sixteen Years Of Age
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. - Significance, Highly Intrusive Searches Should Be Based On Probable Cause
- Soldal v. Cook County - Significance
- Soldal v. Cook County - Impact
- Soldal v. Cook County - The Plain View Exception
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994