Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953

Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado - Significance, Due Process Represents A Living Principle, Only Exclusion Will Deter Violations, Impact

court petitioner decision united

Petitioner

Julius A. Wolf

Respondent

People of the State of Colorado

Petitioner's Claim

That evidence, obtained illegally, should not have been used against Wolf at his state trial for a state offense because it violated his constitutional rights.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Philip Hornbein

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

James S. Henderson

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black, Harold Burton, Felix Frankfurter (writing for the Court), Robert H. Jackson, Stanley Forman Reed, Fred Moore Vinson

Justices Dissenting

William O. Douglas, Frank Murphy, Wiley Blount Rutledge

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

27 June 1949

Decision

Affirmed the decision of the Supreme Court of Colorado to let stand Wolf's conviction on the ground that, although the Fourth Amendment applied to the states, the states were not required to exclude evidence obtained unlawfully.

Related Cases

  • Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914).
  • Palko v. California, 302 U.S. 319 (1937).
  • McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943).
  • Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947).
  • Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).

Further Readings

  • Hall, Kermit L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
  • Levy, Leonard W., ed. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. Vol. 4. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
Woods v. Cloyd W. Miller Co. - Significance, Solicitor General [next] [back] Wickard v. Filburn - Significance, Supreme Court Extends Commerce Power To Production, Further Readings

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or