Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board
Significance, Registration Requirement Struck Down, Senator Joseph Mccarthy
Petitioner
William Albertson
Respondent
Subversive Activities Control Board
Petitioner's Claim
That the requirement of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (the McCarran Act) that members of the Communist Party register with the attorney general violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Kevin T. Maroney
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
John J. Abt
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas, Abe Fortas, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Earl Warren
Justices Dissenting
None (Byron R. White did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
15 November 1965
Decision
This registration requirement of the McCarran Act was struck down as an infringement on a citizens Fifth Amendment rights.
Related Cases
- Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1 (1961).
- United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (1967).
Sources
West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing, 1998.
Further Readings
- Belfrage, Cedric. The American Inquisition, 1945-1960: A profile of the "McCarthy Era." New York, NY: Thunder's Mouth Press, 1989.
- Schrecker, Ellen. The Age of McCarthyism: A Brief History with Documents. Boston: Bedford Books, 1994.
Additional topics
- Alice Crimmins Trials: 1968 1971 - Trial Begins Three Years Later, Observed From Above, A New Trial, Suggestions For Further Reading
- Albert Henry DeSalvo Trial: 1967 - Sanity Hearing, Final Arguments
- Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board - Significance
- Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board - Registration Requirement Struck Down
- Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board - Senator Joseph Mccarthy
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972