Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972

Griffin v. California - Significance, A Remnant Of The Inquisitorial System, Unwarranted Inferences, Impact, Federal Circuit Court

york petitioner defendant west




State of California

Petitioner's Claim

That a prosecutor's comment on the fact that the defendant, Griffin, did not take the stand in a state criminal trial violated the Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

Chief Lawyer for Petitioner

Morris Lavine

Chief Lawyer for Respondent

Albert W. Harris

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas (writing for the Court), Arthur Goldberg, John Marshall Harlan II

Justices Dissenting

Potter Stewart, Byron R. White (Earl Warren did not participate)


Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

28 April 1965


State laws allowing adverse comment on the failure of a defendant to take the witness stand to deny or explain evidence violates a defendant's right not to incriminate himself.

Related Cases

  • Wilson v. United States, 149 U.S. 60 (1893).
  • Twining v. State of New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908).
  • Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947).
  • Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964).


West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing, 1998.

Further Readings

  • FindLaw Internet Legal Resources. http://www.findlaw.com.
  • Hall, Kermit L., ed. The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States. New York: Oxford Press, 1992.
  • Levy, Leonard W., ed. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. Vol. 4. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
  • Lieberman, Jethro K. The Evolving Constitution. New York: Random House, 1992.
Griswold v. Connecticut - Significance, 1879 Law Alive And Well, On To The Supreme Court, Decision Reverses Convictions [next] [back] Green v. County School Board - Historical Background, The Facts At Hand, The Supreme Court Reverses

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 3 years ago

You guys don't say if he is innocent or not and that sucks ok

Vote down Vote up

about 10 years ago

ignorance is bliss. to say the way a court case is portrayed "sucked" only reveals the incapacity for someone to truely understand it

Vote down Vote up

about 11 years ago

i think this case sucked and he should of died or he did and i dont get it?

make it a better story or dont make it a website