Inc. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
Further Readings
- Berkman, Harvey. "High Court Defers to Judges on Scientific Evidence." National Law Journal, December 29, 1997, p. A10.
- Brewer, Scott. "Scientific Expert Testimony and Intellectual Due Process." Yale Law Journal, April 1998, p. 1535.
- Capra, Daniel J. "Evidence; Amendments." The National Law Journal, October 5, 1998, p. B11.
- "Evidence." West's Encyclopedia of American Law. St. Paul: West Group, 1998.
- Green, Michael D. "Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts." Science, November 28, 1997, p. 1574.
- Johnson, Lynn R., Stephen N. Six, and Patrick A. Hamilton. "Deciphering Daubert." Trial, November 1997, p. 71.
- McDonald, James J., Jr. "Daubert in Employment Litigation: A Potent Weapon Against Dubious Science." Employee Relations Law Journal, summer 1998, p. 35.
- McMurry, Kelly. "Fifth Circuit Extends Daubert to Physicians' Causation Testimony." Trial, November 1998, p. 108.
- "When is an `Expert' Not Really an `Expert'?" National Underwriter Property & Casualty-Risk & Benefits Management, September 14, 1998, p. 36.
- White, Jeffrey Robert. "Experts and Judges." Trial, September 1998, p. 91.
- "Whose Body of Evidence." The Economist, July 11, 1998, p. 78.
Additional topics
- Inc. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - Expert Witnesses--are They Really Experts?
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1989 to 1994Inc. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals - Significance, Expert Witnesses--are They Really Experts?, Further Readings