Wiener v. United States
A "quasi-judicial" Body, Shifting Precedents, Justice Felix Frankfurter
Petitioner
Myron Wiener
Respondent
United States
Petitioner's Claim
That the court of claims erred by dismissing his suit for back salary, in the wake of his improper dismissal by the president.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
T. H. Wachtel
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
J. Lee Rankin, U.S. Solicitor General
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., Harold Burton, Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter (writing for the Court), John Marshall Harlan II, Earl Warren, Charles Evans Whittaker
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
30 June 1958
Decision
Wiener was improperly dismissed by the president.
Significance
The decision held that a president does not have the power to arbitrarily remove a "quasi-judicial" commissioner from office.
Related Cases
- Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1926).
- Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935).
Sources
Hurwitz, Howard L. An Encyclopedic Dictionary of American History. New York: Washington Square Press, 1974.
Further Readings
- Baker, Russell. "Dismissal Ruling Curbs President."New York Times, July 1, 1958, p. 20.
- Davis, Kenneth S. F.D.R.--The New Deal Years 1933-1937. New York: Random House, 1979.
- Hall, Kermit, ed. The Oxford Companion To The Supreme Court Of The United States. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Additional topics
- Wilhelm Reich Trial: 1956 - Discovers "orgone", Invents "accumulator", Builds "cloud-buster", Ignores Injunction, Suggestions For Further Reading
- Watkins v. United States - Significance, Supreme Court Rules That Congressional Power Of Investigation Is Not Unlimited, Further Readings
- Wiener v. United States - A "quasi-judicial" Body
- Wiener v. United States - Shifting Precedents
- Wiener v. United States - Justice Felix Frankfurter
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1954 to 1962