Kentucky v. Dennison - Significance, Who Decides?, A Slave Girl And The Man Who Helped Her, On The Eve Of The Civil War
john governor petitioner respondent
Petitioner
State of Kentucky
Respondent
William Dennison, Governor of Ohio
Petitioner's Claim
That Governor Dennison should return to Kentucky the man, Willis Lago, who had allegedly helped a slave to escape and who had been indicted in Kentucky for what was a crime under the laws of that state.
Chief Lawyers for Petitioner
John W. Stevenson, Humphrey Marshall
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Ohio Attorney General Christopher P. Wolcott
Justices for the Court
John Archibald Campbell, John Catron, Nathan Clifford, Robert Cooper Grier, John McLean, Samuel Nelson, Roger Brooke Taney (writing for the Court), James Moore Wayne
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
14 March 1861
Decision
That although it was in fact Governor Dennison's duty to return a fugitive from justice to another state, as the executive authority of a state, he could not be coerced into doing so.
Related Cases
- Prigg v. Pennsylvania, 41 U.S. 539 (1842).
- Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).
- Puerto Rico v. Branstad, 483 U.S. 219 (1987).
User Comments
about 3 years ago
Why can't a case's background and facts be related without tearing into the judge with a biased opinion of him. The decision could not have shocked both the Northerners and Southerners, considering that the decision was exactly what many Northern governors wanted: ex. William Seward governor of NY and Dennison of Ohio. both believed that runaway slaves should not have to be extradited from free states