Additional Topics
According to court testimony, the events involving James Tyrone Woodson and three others on 3 June 1974 took place as follows. Woodson had been drinking heavily when at 9:30 p.m. Luby Waxton and Leonard Tucker arrived at his trailer. Woodson went out to meet him, at which time a belligerent Waxton struck him on the face and threatened to kill him if he did not join the other two in a robbery. Wood…
The Court concluded that North Carolina's mandatory death sentence violated not only the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, but the less often cited Eighth Amendment, which states in full: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." In a joint opinion delivered by Justice Stewart, a plurality composed of Justices Po…
Toward the end of its opinion, the Court had noted that "Death, in its finality, differs more from life imprisonment than a 100-year prison term [differs] from one of only a year or two." On this count, at least, all nine members of the Court would most likely have been in agreement. But to Justice Marshall, the death penalty under any circumstance was cruel and unusual punishment; hence he concur…
Woodson, along with the other capital cases decided on 2 July 1976, just 48 hours before the nation's Bicentennial, was important at least as much for the issues it raised as for the questions it answered. In the years that followed these death penalty cases, numerous others came before the Court, and most made reference to Woodson and the other July of 1976 cases. In Lockett v. Ohio and Bell v. O…
According to Gallup polls taken periodically during the years between 1953 and 1995, the percentage of Americans favoring the death penalty for persons convicted of murder was at its lowest in 1966 (42 percent), and its highest in 1994 (80 percent). The College of Criminal Justice at Sam Houston State University found that in 1996, more than 73 percent of Americans favored the death penalty. Of ma…
Citing this material
Please include a link to this page if you have found this material useful for research or writing a related article. Content on this website is from high-quality, licensed material originally published in print form. You can always be sure you're reading unbiased, factual, and accurate information.
Highlight the text below, right-click, and select “copy”. Paste the link into your website, email, or any other HTML document.
User Comments
12 months ago
soniya
this web site has REALY helped me thank you
almost 2 years ago
Hannah
Case name: Woodson vs. North Carolina
Year: Argued March 31st 1976
Background details of the case: Woodson who was a helper in a robbery/ murder had been announced as first degree murder. In North Carolina there is the death sentence. A group of burglars stole cigarettes and killed the cashier by using a gun. They also took money and hurt one of the customers at a store.
The ruling / verdict: The verdict is the death sentence. The North Carolina law was unconstitutional because it failed to take into account the "fundamental respect for humanity" inherent in the Eighth Amendment's requirement that punishment be "exercised within the limits of civilized standards."
Reasons for the ruling: The Court concluded that North Carolina's mandatory death sentence violated not only the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, but the less often cited Eighth Amendment, which states in full: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."