Roth v. United States - Significance, Supreme Court Defines Obscenity, Further Readings
appellant appellee decision justices
Appellant
Samuel Roth
Appellee
United States
Appellant's Claim
That publication of "obscene" material is protected by the First Amendment.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
David von G. Albrecht and O. John Rogge
Chief Lawyer for Appellee
Roger D. Fisher
Justices for the Court
William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Harold Burton, Tom C. Clark, Felix Frankfurter, Earl Warren, Charles Evans Whittaker
Justices Dissenting
Hugo Lafayette Black, William O. Douglas, John Marshall Harlan II
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
24 June 1957
Decision
The Supreme Court upheld both state and federal laws punishing the sale and distribution of publications of material judged to be obscene or indecent.
Related Cases
- Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931).
- Memoirs v. Massachusetts 383 U.S. 413 (1966).
- Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).
- Paris Adult Theater v. Slaton District Attorney, 413 U.S. 49 (1973).
User Comments