Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1954 to 1962

Roth v. United States - Significance, Supreme Court Defines Obscenity, Further Readings

appellant william john appellee

Appellant

Samuel Roth

Appellee

United States

Appellant's Claim

That publication of "obscene" material is protected by the First Amendment.

Chief Lawyers for Appellant

David von G. Albrecht and O. John Rogge

Chief Lawyer for Appellee

Roger D. Fisher

Justices for the Court

William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Harold Burton, Tom C. Clark, Felix Frankfurter, Earl Warren, Charles Evans Whittaker

Justices Dissenting

Hugo Lafayette Black, William O. Douglas, John Marshall Harlan II

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

24 June 1957

Decision

The Supreme Court upheld both state and federal laws punishing the sale and distribution of publications of material judged to be obscene or indecent.

Related Cases

  • Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931).
  • Memoirs v. Massachusetts 383 U.S. 413 (1966).
  • Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).
  • Paris Adult Theater v. Slaton District Attorney, 413 U.S. 49 (1973).
Samuel Sheppard Trials: 1954 and 1966 - The Carnival Begins, Morals, Not Murder, A Second Chance, Suggestions For Further Reading [next] [back] Roth v. United States - Further Readings

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or