Rosenblatt v. Baer
Significance
Petitioner
Mr. Rosenblatt
Respondent
Mr. Baer
Petitioner's Claim
That by finding Rosenblatt negligent in a civil libel case involving public affairs, a New Hampshire state court violated his freedom of speech, and limited public discussion.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Arthur H. Nighswander
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Stanley M. Brown
Justices for the Court
William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas, Potter Stewart, Hugo Lafayette Black, Earl Warren, Byron R. White
Justices Dissenting
John Marshall Harlan II, Abe Fortas
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
21 February 1966
Decision
Overturned state court's ruling, deciding that Rosenblatt's article was not libelous, and that finding it so would limit free discussion matters of public interest.
Related Cases
- Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 (1940).
- New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).
- Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64 (1964).
- Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153 (1979).
Further Readings
- Biskupic, Joan, and Elder Witt. Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, Inc., 1997.
Additional topics
- Rosenbloom v. Metromedia - Significance, Impact
- Richard Franklin Speck Trial: 1967 - Trial Moved, Mistaken Identity?
- Rosenblatt v. Baer - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972