Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1963 to 1972

New York Times v. Sullivan - Significance, Supreme Court Protects The Press, Actual Malice Standards, Further Readings

alabama appellant decision lawyers


The New York Times Company


L. B. Sullivan

Appellant's Claim

That the Supreme Court of Alabama's affirmation of a libel judgment against the Times violated the free speech and due process rights as defined by the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution and certain Supreme Court decisions; also, that an advertisement published in the Times was not libelous and the Supreme Court should reverse the decision of the Alabama trial court.

Chief Lawyers for Appellant

Herbert Brownell, Thomas F. Daly and Herbert Wechsler

Chief Lawyers for Appellee

Sam Rice Baker, M. Roland Nachman, Jr. and Robert E. Steiner III

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr. (writing for the Court), Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas, Arthur Goldberg, John Marshall Harlan II, Potter Stewart, Earl Warren, Byron R. White

Justices Dissenting



Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

9 March 1964


The Alabama courts' decisions were reversed.

Related Cases

  • Stromberg v. California,283 U.S. 359 (1931).
  • DeJonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353 (1937).
  • Lovell v. Griffin, 303 U.S. 444 (1938).
  • Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949).
  • Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957).
  • Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513 (1958).
  • NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963).


Cornell. http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/


Onion Field Murder Trials: 1963-69 - Start Of A Legal Marathon, Exit Kanarek, Death Penalty Decision [next] [back] New York Times Company v. United States - Significance, The Government Moves To Stop The Leak, Supreme Court Throws Out Government's Case

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or