Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1954 to 1962

Reynolds v. Pegler - Significance, Reynolds Sues For Libel, Libel: Are Large Settlements Deterrents?

plaintiff york defendants quentin

Plaintiff

Quentin Reynolds

Defendants

Westbrook Pegler, The Hearst Corporation, and Hearst Consolidated Publications

Plaintiff's Claim

That a certain column published by the defendants on 29 November 1949 libeled the plaintiff.

Chief Lawyers for Plaintiff

Walter S. Beck, Paul Martinson, Louis Nizer

Chief Defense Lawyer

Charles Henry

Judge

Edward Weinfeld

Place

New York, New York

Date of Decision

22 July 1954

Decision

Against all defendants: Reynolds awarded $1 in compensatory damages and $175,000 in punitive damages.

Related Cases

  • New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).
  • Westmoreland v. CBS, 770 F. 2d 1168 (1984).
  • Hustler Magazine v. Falwell, 485 U.S. 46 (1988).

Sources

Pressman, Steven. "An Unfettered Press. Libel Law in the United States." http://www.usia.gov/usa/infousa/media/unfetter/press08.htm

Further Readings

  • Farr, Finis. Fair Enough: The Life of Westbrook Pegler. New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House Publishers, 1975.
  • Nizer, Louis. My Life in Court. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co., 1961.
  • Pilat, Oliver Ramsay. Pegler, Angry Man of the Press. Boston: Beacon Press, 1963.
  • Reynolds, Quentin. By Quentin Reynolds. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963.
Reynolds v. Pegler: 1954 - Reynolds Sues For Libel [next] [back] Reply Brief for Appellants in Nos. 2 (1,) and 3 and for Respondents in No. on Further Reargument (5 ) - In The Supreme Court Of The United States October Term, 1954, Appeals From The United States District Courts For The District Of Kansas, The Eastern Di

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or