Inc. v. America Online Cyber Promotions Inc.
Significance, Private Restriction On Internet Speech Is Valid, Impact, Related Cases, Further Readings
Plaintiff
Cyber Promotions, Inc.
Defendant
America Online, Inc.
Plaintiff's Claim
That the defendant's blocking of e-mail advertisements sent by the plaintiff to the defendant's customers violated the plaintiff's right to free speech under the First Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Plaintiff
Ralph A. Jacobs
Chief Defense Lawyer
Ronald P. Schiller
Judge
Charles R. Weiner
Place
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Date of Decision
4 November 1996
Decision
That because the defendant was a private company, rather than a public actor, its blocking of the plaintiff's e-mail advertisements did not violate the First Amendment; the First Amendment only prevents public officials from restricting freedom of speech, not private actors.
Additional topics
- Darlie Routier Trial: 1997 - A House Stained By Blood, Deadly Or Doting Mother?
- Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America - Significance, Exclusion Of Gays, Atheists, And Agnostics, Boy Scouts In New Jersey, Impact
- Inc. v. America Online Cyber Promotions Inc. - Further Readings
- Inc. v. America Online Cyber Promotions Inc. - Significance
- Inc. v. America Online Cyber Promotions Inc. - Private Restriction On Internet Speech Is Valid
- Inc. v. America Online Cyber Promotions Inc. - Impact
- Inc. v. America Online Cyber Promotions Inc. - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1995 to Present