Inc. v. Firestone Time
Significance
Petitioner
Time, Inc., publisher of Time magazine
Respondent
Mary Alice Firestone
Petitioner's Claim
That the finding of libel was inappropriate because the respondent was a public figure.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
John H. Pickering
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Edna L. Caruso
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun, Warren E. Burger, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., William H. Rehnquist (writing for the Court), Potter Stewart
Justices Dissenting
William J. Brennan, Jr., Thurgood Marshall, Byron R. White (John Paul Stevens did not participate)
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
2 March 1976
Decision
That Firestone was not a public figure for the purposes of this trial; case remanded to state court for determination of whether defendant was at fault.
Related Cases
- New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964).
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974).
- Cox Broadcasting Corp, v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469 (1975).
Further Readings
- Brooklyn Law Review, Summer, 1976, p. 123.
- Creighton Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 351.
- DePaul Law Review, Summer, 1977, p. 863.
- Mercer Law Review,Vol. 38, p. 809.
Additional topics
- Tony Boyle Trial: 1974 - Annette Gilly Confesses, Boyle Balks On Arraignment, Boyle's Secretary Spoils Defense
- Theodore Robert Bundy Trials: 1976 1979 - Bundy Forgoes Jury, On The Run And Deadly, Testimony That Could Kill
- Inc. v. Firestone Time - Significance
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1973 to 1980