Terminiello v. Chicago
Significance, Impact
Petitioner
Father Arthur Terminiello
Respondent
City of Chicago
Petitioner's Claim
That the Chicago ordinance against disturbing the peace violated Terminiello's right of free expression as guaranteed by the First Amendment.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Albert W. Dilling
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
L. Louis Karton
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William O. Douglas (writing for the Court), Frank Murphy, Stanley Forman Reed, Wiley Blount Rutledge
Justices Dissenting
Harold Burton, Felix Frankfurter, Robert H. Jackson, Fred Moore Vinson
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
16 May 1949
Decision
Reversed Illinois decision affirming Terminiello's conviction for disturbing the peace on grounds that the trial judge's instructions to the jury defined "breach of peace" too narrowly.
Related Cases
- Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940).
- Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).
- Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951).
- Feiner v. New York, 340 U.S. 315 (1951).
Further Readings
- Emerson, Thomas I. The System of Freedom of Expression, New York: Random House, 1970.
- Kalven, Harry, Jr. A Worthy Tradition: Freedom of Speech in America. New York: Harper and Row, 1988.
- New Republic, May 30, 1949.
- Newsweek, May 30, 1949.
- Time, May 30, 1949.
- Tresolini, Rocco J. These Liberties. New York: Lippincott, 1968.
Additional topics
- Terry v. Adams - Significance, The Jaybird Primary, A Pressure Group, Impact
- Sweatt v. Painter - Significance, Court Finds That "separate" Facilities Cannot Be "equal"
- Terminiello v. Chicago - Significance
- Terminiello v. Chicago - Impact
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953