Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953

Marsh v. Alabama - Significance, The Special Case Of A Company Town, The Rights Of Property Owners, The Consequences Of Marsh V. Alabama

appellant court justices vol


Grace Marsh


State of Alabama

Appellant's Claim

That she had the freedom to distribute religious literature of the Jehovah's Witnesses on a "public" street in the company-owned town of Chickasaw, Alabama, despite the privately owned town's refusal to issue her a permit and the Alabama state law supporting property owners' right to ask individuals to leave their property.

Chief Lawyer for Appellant

Hayden C. Covington

Chief Lawyers for Appellee

William M. McQueen, Attorney General of Alabama, and John O. Harris, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama

Justices for the Court

Hugo Lafayette Black (writing for the Court), William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, Robert H. Jackson, Frank Murphy, Owen Josephus Roberts, Wiley Blount Rutledge

Justices Dissenting

Harold Burton, Stanley Forman Reed, Harlan Fiske Stone (Robert H. Jackson did not participate)


Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

7 January 1946


The First and the Fourteenth Amendments prohibit states from imposing punishment on people who distribute religious literature, even in a company town; therefore, Marsh's conviction was overturned.

Related Cases

  • Tucker v. Texas, 326 U.S. 517 (1946).
  • Breard v. City of Alexandria, 341 U.S. 622 (1951).
  • Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner, 407 U.S. 551 (1972).

Further Readings

  • Bartholomew, Paul C. American Constitutional Law: Limitations on Government, Vol. II. Totowa, NJ, Littlefield, Adams, 1970, 1978.
  • Pollak, Louis H., ed. The Constitution and the Supreme Court: A Documentary History, Vol. II. Cleveland: World Publishing Co., 1966.
  • Summaries of Leading Cases on the Constitution. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co., 1976.
Martha Beck Trial: 1949 - Partnership Thrives, The Kiss In The Courtroom, Suggestions For Further Reading [next] [back] Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber - Petitioner's Claim, Decision, Significance, A Cruel And Unusual Punishment?, What Is The State's Responsibility?

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or