Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Notable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940

Gitlow v. New York - Significance, Victory For Free Speech, Criminal Anarchy

law court petitioner review

Petitioner

Benjamin Gitlow, publisher of The Revolutionary Age newspaper

Respondent

State of New York

Petitioner's Claim

That a statute making a crime of anarchy violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Chief Lawyers for Petitioner

Walter Nelles and Walter H. Pollak

Chief Lawyers for Respondent

W.J. Weatherbee, Deputy Attorney General of New York, and John Caldwell Myers, Assistant District Attorney of New York County

Justices for the Court

Pierce Butler, James Clark McReynolds, Edward Terry Sanford (writing for the Court), Harlan Fiske Stone, George Sutherland, William Howard Taft, Willis Van Devanter

Justices Dissenting

Louis D. Brandeis, Oliver Wendell Holmes

Place

Washington, D.C.

Date of Decision

8 June 1925

Decision

Found Gitlow's conviction was constitutional.

Related Cases

  • Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931).
  • Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).
  • Feiner v. New York, 340 U.S. 315 (1951).
  • Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951).
  • Bigelow v. Virginia, 421 U.S. 809 (1975).
  • R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992).

Sources

Murray, Robert K. Red Scare: A Study of National Hysteria, 1919-1920. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964.

Further Readings

  • Harvard Civil Rights--Civil Liberties Law Review, spring 1982, p. 1.
  • Harvard Law Review, Vol. 34, p. 431.
  • Johnson, John W., ed. Historic U.S. Court Cases, 1690-1990: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing, 1992.
  • New York University Law Review, May 1994, p. 421.
  • Yale Law Journal, Vol. 35, p. 108.
Gloria Vanderbilt Custody Trial: 1934 - "we Are Moving Again—oh What A Life", "trial Of The Century", Suggestions For Further Reading [next] [back] Gitlow v. New York

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

over 9 years ago

Thank you. Succinct and understandable. You made it easy to explain to my class.