Additional Topics
In his dissent, Holmes advanced a revised version of his own "clear and present danger" standard in Schenck v. United States The new standard gave greater protection to political speech, even during wartime. Holmes's reasoning was adopted by the Court during the 1930s and serves as the basis for legal doctrines upholding freedom of expression. During World War I, the Supreme Court, for the first t…
Fewer than a dozen cases involving free expression had come before the Supreme Court prior to 1918. In these cases, the Court upheld federal and state laws limiting speech and other forms of expression that "tended" to have a bad effect. In Patterson v. Colorado (1907), for example, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes had argued that freedom of the press meant merely freedom from censorship prior to pub…
In June of 1917, two months after the U.S. entered the war, Congress passed the Espionage Act. The act established three basic wartime offenses: conveying false information intended to interfere with U.S. military operations, causing insubordination in the military, and obstructing recruiting. In May of 1918, the Sedition Act added nine additional offenses. Taken together, these made it illegal to…
Jacob Abrams and his codefendants--Hyman Lachowsky, Jacob Schwartz, Mollie Steimer, and Samuel Lipman--were Russian-born Jews living in the East Harlem section of New York. They became involved with the Yiddish-language paper Der Shturm (The Storm), which advocated anarchist doctrines and policies. With their fellow anarchists, they sought to destroy capitalism and government and create a collecti…
The trial of Abrams and his associates began on 14 October 1918, before Henry DeLamar Clayton, an Alabama judge temporarily assigned to New York. A former congressman (author of the Clayton Anti-Trust Act), Clayton hated Germany, especially after his beloved younger brother was killed in France by German soldiers. Judge Clayton was overtly hostile throughout the trial. Despite a vigorous defense f…
Holmes dissented, joined by Brandeis. Holmes centered his argument on the government's failure to prove intent. The word intent, he argued, often was vaguely used to mean only that a certain act had a tendency to cause a certain effect. But "when words are used exactly, a deed is not done with intent to produce a consequence unless that consequence is the aim of the deed." Intent means, in other w…
In an eloquent final paragraph, for which the dissent is famous, Holmes discussed the connection between freedom of speech, the search for truth, and the value of experimentation. It is perfectly logical to persecute opposing views if one assumes one knows the truth. But when men have realized that time has upset many fighting faiths, they may come to believe even . . . that the ultimate good desi…
The Espionage Act of 1917 outlawed making false statements, in speech or writing, for the purpose of causing insubordination, or for suppressing or obstructing recruitment of men into the U.S. military at times of war. The act prohibited an individual or group from using the mail for transmitting materials containing statements outlawed under the act. Postmasters could refuse to distribute such ma…
Citing this material
Please include a link to this page if you have found this material useful for research or writing a related article. Content on this website is from high-quality, licensed material originally published in print form. You can always be sure you're reading unbiased, factual, and accurate information.
Highlight the text below, right-click, and select “copy”. Paste the link into your website, email, or any other HTML document.
User Comments Add a comment…
8 months ago
Sam Fleshin » SFleshin ((at)) aol dot com
The person that was not mentioned was my uncle. He was the constant companion of mollie and very active in their movement. I never met my uncle but am interested in what I can find out. His name was Senya Fleshin.