National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama
Significance, Related Cases, Further Readings
Petitioner
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
Respondent
State of Alabama
Petitioner's Claim
That the state of Alabama could not force the association to produce a list including the names and addresses of its members and agents, and that a temporary restraining order barring the association from operation in Alabama was unconstitutional.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Robert L. Carter
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Edmond L. Rinehart, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, William J. Brennan, Jr., Harold Burton, Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas, John Marshall Harlan II (writing for the Court), Potter Stewart, Earl Warren, Charles Evans Whittaker
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
30 June 1958
Decision
That the state's demand for a complete membership list was unconstitutional given Fourteenth Amendment protection of the right of free association and the right of pursuit of one's lawful interests; the Court did allow the restraining order barring the association from operating in Alabama to stand by refusing to consider the association's challenge.
Additional topics
- New York Times v. Sullivan - How To Use Milestones In The Law, This Case In History - ISSUE
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District - Torts And Liability, Sovereign Immunity, The Narrowing Of Immunity, Tort Liability
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama - Further Readings
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama - Significance
- National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama - Related Cases
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1954 to 1962