Pennsylvania v. Nelson
Significance, Cold Warriors Outraged By Court's Decision In Favor Of Communist Party Leader
Petitioner
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Respondent
Steve Nelson
Petitioner's Claim
That the Pennsylvania Supreme Court erred in overturning the conviction of Nelson, a Communist Party leader, under the state's antisedition law.
Chief Lawyer for Petitioner
Frank F. Truscott, Special Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania
Chief Lawyer for Respondent
Herbert S. Thatcher
Justices for the Court
Hugo Lafayette Black, Tom C. Clark, William O. Douglas, Felix Frankfurter, John Marshall Harlan II, Earl Warren (writing for the Court)
Justices Dissenting
Harold Burton, Sherman Minton, Stanley Forman Reed
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
2 April 1956
Decision
The U.S. Supreme Court found the Pennsylvania antisedition law unconstitutional and upheld the reversal of Nelson's conviction.
Related Cases
- Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925).
- Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (1927).
- Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951).
Further Readings
- Belknap, Michal R. Cold War Political Justice: The Smith Act, the Communist Party, and American Civil Liberties. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1977.
- Kutler, Stanley I. The American Inquisition: Justice and Injustice in the Cold War. New York, NY: Hill and Wang, 1982.
- Zimmerman, Joseph F. Federal Preemption: The Silent Revolution. Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1991.
Additional topics
- Perez v. Brownell - Significance, Congress Can Seek To Limit "embarrassing" Actions, Fourteenth Amendment Guarantee In Jeopardy
- May Opinion of the Supreme Court (31,) (1955) - In The Supreme Court Of The United States
- Pennsylvania v. Nelson - Significance
- Pennsylvania v. Nelson - Cold Warriors Outraged By Court's Decision In Favor Of Communist Party Leader
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1954 to 1962