Whitney v. California
Significance, Supreme Court Upholds California Criminal Syndicalism Law, The California Criminal Syndicalism Act, Further Readings
Appellant
Charlotte Anita Whitney
Appellee
People of the State of California
Appellant's Claim
That a 1919 California criminal syndicalism law violated the First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and association.
Chief Lawyers for Appellant
Walter H. Pollak, Walter Nelles
Chief Lawyers for Appellee
John H. Riordan, U. S. Webb
Justices for the Court
Louis D. Brandeis, Pierce Butler, Oliver Wendell Holmes, James Clark McReynolds, Edward Terry Sanford (writing for the Court), Harlan Fiske Stone, George Sutherland, William Howard Taft, Willis Van Devanter
Justices Dissenting
None
Place
Washington, D.C.
Date of Decision
26 May 1927
Decision
The Supreme Court upheld the California law.
Related Cases
- Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919).
- Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951).
- Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).
Sources
Levy, Leonard W., ed. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: Macmillan, 1986.
Additional topics
- William Lancaster Trial: 1932 - Forged Letters, Confident Defendant
- West Coast Hotel v. Parrish - Significance, A Test Case, A Close Vote, James Clark Mcreynolds, Further Readings
- Whitney v. California - Further Readings
- Whitney v. California - Significance
- Whitney v. California - Supreme Court Upholds California Criminal Syndicalism Law
- Whitney v. California - The California Criminal Syndicalism Act
- Other Free Encyclopedias
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1918 to 1940