Brief for Respondent

DARRELL F. SMITH,
The Attorney General of Arizona

GARY K. NELSON,
Assistant Attorney General Rm. 159, State Capitol Bldg., Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Attorneys for Respondent

GARY K. NELSON,
Assistant Attorney General, Of Counsel

Index

Opinion Below, Jurisdiction, Constitutional Provisions Involved
Question Presented
Statement of the Case
Summary of Argument
Argument

1. Introduction
2. There are no inherent defects either in this defendant, the operation of law enforcement agencies, or in our system of criminal justice, which require a rule of the constitutional impact and proportions here sought by petitioner
   1. The defendant
   2. The police
   3. The nature of the contest
3. Miranda was not denied his right to counsel as guaranteed to him by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States
   1. The Arizona court's decision
   2. Escobedo v. Miranda

Conclusion
Appendix A
Appendix B