Appendix to Appellants' Briefs
Iv
The problem with which we have here attempted to deal is admittedly on the frontiers of scientific knowledge. Inevitably, there must be some differences of opinion among us concerning the conclusiveness of certain items of evidence, and concerning the particular choice of words and placement of emphasis in the preceding statement. We are nonetheless in agreement that this statement is substantially correct and justified by the evidence, and the differences among us, if any, are of a relatively minor order and would not materially influence the preceding conclusions.
FLOYD H. ALLPORT
Syracuse, New York
GORDON W. ALLPORT
Cambridge, Massachusetts
CHARLOTTE BABCOCK, M.D.
Chicago, Illinois
VIOLA W. BERNARD, M.D.
New York, New York
JEROME S. BRUNER
Cambridge, Massachusetts
HADLEY CANTRIL
Princeton, New Jersey
ISIDOR CHEIN
New York, New York
KENNETH B. CLARK
New York, New York
MAMIE P. CLARK
New York, New York
STUART W. COOK
New York, New York
BINGHAM DAI
Durham, North Carolina
ALLISON DAVIS
Chicago, Illinois
ELSE FRENKEL-BRUNSWIK
Berkeley, California
NOEL P. GIST
Columbia, Missouri
DANIEL KATZ
Ann Arbor, Michigan
OTTO KLINEBERG
New York, New York
DAVID KRECH
Berkeley, California
ALFRED MCCLUNG LEE
Brooklyn, New York
R. M. MACIVER
New York, New York
ROBERT K. MERTON
New York, New York
GARDNER MURPHY
Topeka, Kansas
THEODORE M. NEWCOMB
Ann Arbor, Michigan
ROBERT REDFIELD
Chicago, Illinois
IRA DEA. REID
Haverford, Pennsylvania
ARNOLD M. ROSE
Minneapolis, Minnesota
GERHART SAENGER
New York, New York
R. NEVITT SANFORD
Poughkeepsie, New York
S. STANFIELD SARGENT
New York, New York
M. BREWSTER SMITH
New York, New York
SAMUEL A. STOUFFER
Cambridge, Massachusetts
WELLMAN WARNER
New York, New York
ROBIN M. WILLIAMS
Ithaca, New York
Dated: September 22, 1952.
Additional topics
Law Library - American Law and Legal InformationNotable Trials and Court Cases - 1941 to 1953Appendix to Appellants' Briefs - In The Supreme Court Of The United States October Term, 1952, Appendix To Appellants' Briefsthe Effects Of Segregation And The Consequences Of Desegregation: A Social Science Statementstatement Of Counsel