Other Free Encyclopedias » Law Library - American Law and Legal Information » Free Legal Encyclopedia: Lemuel Shaw Biography to Special plea » Sherman Anti-Trust Act - Restraint Of Trade, Concerted Action, Price Fixing, Market Allocations, Boycotts, Tying Arrangements

Sherman Anti-Trust Act - Boycotts

agree illegal participants competitor

A boycott, or a concerted refusal to deal, occurs when two or more companies agree not to deal with a third party. These agreements may be clearly anticompetitive and may violate the Sherman Act because they can result in the elimination of competition or the reduction in the number of participants entering the market to compete with existing participants. Boycotts that are created by groups with market power and that are designed to eliminate a competitor or to force that competitor to agree to a group standard are per se illegal. Boycotts that are more cooperative in nature, designed to increase economic efficiency or make markets more competitive, are subject to the Rule of Reason. Generally, most courts have found that horizontal boycotts, but not vertical boycotts, are per se illegal.

Sherman Anti-Trust Act - Tying Arrangements [next] [back] Sherman Anti-Trust Act - Market Allocations

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or